ONE LIFE IS NOT ENOUGH BOOK PDF

adminComment(0)

Here you can directly get it ⇩ ⇰ File formats: ePub, PDF, site, Audiobook, mobi , ZIP. Download >> One Life Is Not Enough An Autobiography. ONE LIFE IS NOT ENOUGH book. Read 78 reviews from the world's largest community for readers. A bureaucrat for over three decades—and then a vital player. Today there are several more books about the. Partition, but when you of view, so many that one life is not enough to experience them? So many of us believe.


One Life Is Not Enough Book Pdf

Author:EUGENE PETITT
Language:English, Indonesian, French
Country:Sierra Leone
Genre:Business & Career
Pages:534
Published (Last):03.11.2015
ISBN:865-8-68850-544-7
ePub File Size:23.69 MB
PDF File Size:16.48 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Register to download]
Downloads:48950
Uploaded by: BENJAMIN

one life is not enough natwar singh pdf download. One Life Is Not Enough Natwar Singh Pdf Download. 14 Reads 0 Votes 1 Part Story. rinorcumbpha. K. Natwar Singh_One Life is Not Enough - Ebook download as PDF File Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd . No one could edit my book. Editorial Reviews. About the Author. Kunwar Natwar Singh was born on May 16, Look inside this book. One Life is Not Enough by [Singh, K. Natwar].

Share this article Share In an interview with a leading news channel, Singh bolsters this opinion with another 'pearl of wisdom'. One can consider this book his version of the truth seen through jaundiced eyes.

Misogyny Apart from calling Sonia Gandhi 'ruthless' and 'a weak politician', the book is an exercise in deep-seated misogyny, given that Singh has no problem with the 'tough' decisions taken by the male politicians that he has worked with in the past.

His self-congratulatory tone and his list of achievements thinly veil his own arrogance. Singh clearly appears miffed with the Congress president for dismissing him as the foreign minister, but factually it was not an ad hoc dismissal.

First, the Volcker Commission Report created an uproar in Parliament, after which Singh's own aide spoke against him; it was only then, with careful consideration, that he was dismissed from his post.

The book, however, distorts the truth, or tells half-truths - and that in my opinion is unacceptable. What makes his writing even more regrettable is that Singh had many years as a Gandhi loyalist. Indira was interested in books; it so happened that the young diplomat had read the same book that she had picked up on the plane -- so goes a story within the fraternity.

Soon a posting in the powerful PMO ensued. To identify the locus of power and to gain proximity to it is an art that highly successful diplomats cultivate.

It seems that this came naturally to Natwar Singh. But one should not think that the celebrities that he came to know were only political personalities. A good diplomat ought to have a lively curiosity, be interested in ideas, cultures, and conversation and be open to opportunities that come his way in befriending interesting people. So goes the lore. As a young officer on district training in the south, Natwar Singh curious to see R K Narayan, just drops in at his home to find a modest man in a vesti pottering in the garden.

The two get acquainted and talk about books. But it is entirely to the credit of the young diplomat, that over the years he is able to fulfil R K Narayan's modest wishes: To see the Mughal gardens at Rashtrapati Bhavan, to meet Nehru once, or get vegetarian meals in New York.

A relationship evolves, nothing to do with power, but pleasurable and prestigious in its own way. Somewhat similar is the case with Nirad Chaudhari, an acerbic man, who in the normal course was disdainful of most people, let alone Sarkari bhadralok.

Navigation menu

He has a fine feel for human comedy and a subtle understanding of what makes people say and do the things that they say and do. Natwar Singh went to China, when it was difficult, but brimming with enthusiasm and with a positive mind. Thirty years later and with a legacy of differences between the two countries, he still saw the need to normalise the relationship and claims as a modest achievement on his part, Rajiv Gandhi's visit to China in As a young diplomat in New York, he had become acquainted with the African freedom fighters who came before the UN decolonisation committee.

Years later, what was deemed to be a punishment posting to Zambia, proved to be effective since he already knew Kenneth Kaunda, the leader of that country. Whether Natwar Singh was undone by those that he perceived were close to him or not, his outpouring of angst against them marks the theme of the book.

He is articulate. Hence, his barbs are precise and incisive. He hardly smiled and his disgust and anger was almost always writ large on his face. His book too is a reflection of this part of his personality. Coming down so heavily against those that, as per his own admission, were so close to him, appears unethical. However, if Sanjay Baru could d Whether Natwar Singh was undone by those that he perceived were close to him or not, his outpouring of angst against them marks the theme of the book.

However, if Sanjay Baru could do it and make millions, why couldn't he. The book itself is interesting only in parts. As in so many autobiographies, the "I" factor dominates. There was so much wrong with the world and the "I" suffered on account of that.

There is no introspection. But Natwar Singh was perhaps never known to introspect. He rode the high horse and when he fell, he cursed all around him. Nov 04, Himanshu rated it liked it. For all his follies, Natwar Singh has got the title spot on. Serving in various capacities from Nehru's time speaks of the immense amount of history which has unfolded before him.

The book is peppered with lot many anecdotes. However one point still baffles me. Is he still expecting some political high offices from congress? I do envy his life as an IFS officer. He rubbed shoulders with almost all the important people of his time, the very people about whom I used to read in history books.

At the end I was expecting a more rational assessment of Sonia Gandhi and her legacy but what I got was a feeble protest. But this 'autobiography' turned out to be a pretty damp squib without much enthusiasm. Perhaps it was just written for the sake of being written. Bureaucrat turned politician writes a political autobiography which is candid, honest and clear and could easily ruffle a few feathers.

He comes across as a very highly experienced foreign affairs diplomat thanks to the multiple decades he spent in countries like China, UK and Africa. Good read. Television became widespread in India only in the s. Many of us were schoolchildren then, and we were glued to the TV sets, be it showing news, agricultural programs, movie or sports. Thankfully, the choice was easy as we had only the state-run Doordarshan to watch.

News on TV meant never ending scenes of ministers inaugurating various projects, attending conferences and foreign visits. But we enjoyed every bit of it, th Television became widespread in India only in the s. But we enjoyed every bit of it, the novelty of seeing the whole world sitting in your room was so exhilarating.

One of the familiar faces on TV along with that of Rajiv Gandhi, who was the prime minister, was that of Shri.

He was very familiar to news watchers and had the glamour of resigning from the prestigious Indian Foreign Service to join politics. There is only one family that counts for anything in the Congress party then as well as now, and he was very close to it. He worked in various diplomatic missions abroad before quitting and joining the cabinet of Rajiv Gandhi and Manmohan Singh. He produces nice reminiscences of events of those years in this book, which is very attractive to readers on account of its simple yet elegant diction.

His style is not humble, by any stretch of the imagination. Singh declares in the prologue that he does not believe in equality — fraternity yes, but no equality. Anyhow, he has succeeded in bringing out a thoroughly useful book for the casual reader. The book presents a handy sketch of the person and administration of Jawaharlal Nehru. Having a natural turn to reading and having spent almost a decade in jail during the freedom struggle, Nehru was a very learned man and a voracious reader.

But his vast knowledge imparted an air of condescension in his dealings with foreign leaders, and took the form of moralizing on the diplomatic arena. Nehru protested from the roof top when Britain invaded Egypt in when the Suez Canal was nationalized by them. Natwar Singh identifies three blunders committed by Nehru which caused lasting damage to India. He moved the international body under Chapter 6 of its Charter dealing with disputes, while it should have been filed under Chapter 7, concerned with aggression from a foreign country.

In all these vexed issues, Nehru readily accepted the flawed advice offered by Lord Mountbatten, who had a different agenda than that of the Indian government. He was asked to continue as Governor General of free India by Nehru.

Singh also mentions that what Nehru did immediately after returning from his Chinese visit in was to apprise Lady Mountbatten of all people! The miserably lost war with China personally devastated Nehru. Singh attaches two such letters written by Nehru to President Kennedy, literally begging him to provide military equipment and staff during the war with China. Diehard patriots would find it difficult to read the letters without heartburn.

But the single most terrible setback for modern India was his refusal to accept a permanent seat at the UN Security Council when it was offered by the USSR on the ground that only China has the moral right to be there! All such moral postures were flown to the winds when India forcibly liberated Goa from Portuguese control.

Western media flayed him for this misdemeanor from one who preaches to the world about what is morally right.

An aristocratic birth in India guarantees connections at the highest levels and and an exalted career. Belonging to a prominent family of Bharatpur, having relationship with royalty and having married the daughter of the Maharajah of Patiala, Natwar Singh was the epitome of the bureaucrat who could talk in private with the prime minister at any time — and to a person no less than Indira Gandhi!

This was a tricky issue when Emergency was proclaimed in The book contains passages in which the author, who was in London at that time, speaking out against it. This is far from convincing. The ire he received from the Janata Party leaders, who trounced Congress in the very next election after lifting Emergency, stands in silent testimony to his activities, or at least its perception by opposition leaders.

He was shunted to Zambia by the Janata government. Singh even refused to introduce his pretty wife to Desai even though the prime minister actually requested it during a friendly talk.

Share this article

His star shone brightly when Indira returned to power. He resigned from his official post with five years to go for retirement and managed a seat from Indira to contest in the very next parliamentary election. He planned for a Rajya Sabha seat, but the power brokers of Indira got jealous of him and allotted the Bharatpur Lok Sabha seat, his own constituency.

He also got decorated with Padma Bhushan when she was in power. The author is unusually candid towards Rajiv Gandhi at whose cabinet he served as a minister of state. Rajiv pay rolled LTTE which finally took his life. We see Rajiv as a weak administrator after when he feigned ignorance of Operation Brasstacks which was the largest military exercise held very close to the Pak border.

Singh blames the coterie that surrounded Rajiv for what took place, but falls short of directly naming them. They are described as three ignoramuses with inflated egos, one a socialist, one inept political wheeler-dealer and the third a meddling nuisance p. But watchful readers need only turn to p. The author could have saved the trouble.

Congress party asked for resignation which transformed the author to a ferocious, wounded tiger. He attacks each and every person who asked him to step down, even though they were only sacking a tainted colleague. He flays Manmohan Singh as a decent though spineless man, who never stands up for his colleagues p.

Paul Volcker, the former chairman of U. Federal Reserve who drafted the UN report that indicted Singh is said to be biased.

The allegations are directionless and much mudslinging is done by the author who is infuriated at the prospect of being called corrupt.

Having a wide experience in book reviews and an avid reader himself, Singh identifies understatement, restraint and objectivity to have a paralyzing effect on an autobiography. True to the norm, it should as subjective as it could be.

One Life Is Not Enough

Two halves are clearly discernible in the text. The half that ends with his becoming a minister is witty, having many anecdotes and down to earth observations. But the latter half is in stark contrast to this. The author seems to have lost his grip on humour the moment he took the oath of office as a minister. Here, it takes on the appearance of a diary, with dry recordings of happenings. Verbatim accounts of speeches and meetings make this half more lackluster.

The book boasts a good index and a number of colour plates. A chronology of events would be a nice addition to the second edition. The book is highly recommended. Mar 06, Abhijeet Aanand rated it really liked it. This one is brutally honest and straight from the heart. I am not really a big fan of autobiographies but somehow, decided to give it a try primarily because this one was coming from a veteran diplomat turned politician. Diplomats seem to be an altogether different breed of people to me and my fascination for knowing more about a diplomat's life was an instant turn on for trying this one out.

Beginning on a slow note, things pick up pace when he joins Foreign Service and begins his career with a This one is brutally honest and straight from the heart. Beginning on a slow note, things pick up pace when he joins Foreign Service and begins his career with a stint in Mao's China. The chapters dealing with various diplomatic assignments are full of anecdotes and serve as an interesting read especially the ones dealing with postings in Zambia and Pakistan under Zia-ul-Haq.

One of the things which makes this book stand out is its vivid description of various events which have carved a place for themselves in history. Having dealt with most of the popular leaders of his time, the author tries his best to do a comprehensive assessment of their personalities and their style of politics.

Being somebody who has been closely associated with Nehru-Gandhi family, K. Natwar Singh has not shied away from disclosing a lot of facts which might be deemed controversial in the long run. His experiences under J.

Nehru and Indira Gandhi have found significant representation in this text. In spite of his attempts to conceal his dislike for Sonia Gandhi, it does find expression in later parts of the book particularly in chapters dealing with Volcker controversy and its aftermath. Being a first hand witness to power dynamics operating behind curtains, his autobiography is a treat for anybody who has a keen interest in politics and international relations.

Jun 01, Aashish Satyajith rated it did not like it Shelves: Gave up on this book. Too much politics in it to be an enjoyable read. The first thing that immediately strikes you is the kind of network being a diplomat can get you access to. The second thing that strikes you is the kind of politics people play to stay there.

Everything, even seemingly simple gestures, has a hidden meaning to it. Reading too much in between the lines till you can dig no further is a matter of survival than choice.

“One Life is Not Enough”: Natwar Singh’s autobiography to rock the capital

You'd think if all these diplomats spent time working towards Gave up on this book. You'd think if all these diplomats spent time working towards making India better, she would be in a much better position than she is today. I'm reminded of someone having said something along the lines of the top bureaucrats in India being like sports cars stuck in a traffic jam; individually they're all very capable and whatnot, but put them together and they're locked in. This book makes all the case for it.

That Singh has added in his personal opinions it's his book after all doesn't help either. If you're interested in gossips, politics and scandals and have a taste for Indian history, then this could be a book for you. Otherwise, it might be better to spend your time on something else. Nov 10, Janakan Manivannan rated it liked it. I was very much looking forward to read this book as Mr. Natwar Singhs case is a classic example of a political rollercoaster with Machiavellian underpinnings.

His proximity to Nehru family and his part in various important turns the country took with Indira and Rajiv as steerers. His views on Sonia are abruptly prejudiced and had a misogynistic tone. The latter part of the book is filled with indignant tales , and Natwar starts griping everyone around him.

A one time read for Modern India followers. May 22, Abhishek Shekhar rated it really liked it. Don't have sky high expectation from this book. But the choice of words and phrases will amaze you for sure. Though a little cliche and sometimes looks like one is reading a diary with no direction on story but then that's how memoirs are.

Yes its a memoir only. Good thing is that you will get a list of old books mentioned here and there which you might consider reading. Author has himself read a lot and has been editor for so many publishers that makes this book roadworthy even though it could Don't have sky high expectation from this book.

Author has himself read a lot and has been editor for so many publishers that makes this book roadworthy even though it could have been better. The author and narrator look sound so different one a hero with class and should have rose to Prime Minister the other a loser with false allegations and betrayal.

Aug 07, Geetha Krishna rated it liked it. This gives a broader perspective of his diplomatic and political career. His writing style is straightforward, not too dramatic and witty. I was impressed with his work ethics and the balance he strike between steadfastness and exhibiting diplomacy, I found the first pages of book bit boring, fails to capture readers interest, but it picks up the pace with his 1st assignment in china. You can understand the typical functioning of diplomat, the dilemma he undergoes and throws some light on vo This gives a broader perspective of his diplomatic and political career.

You can understand the typical functioning of diplomat, the dilemma he undergoes and throws some light on volker crisis which allegedly tainted the image of natwar. His acrid tone on sonia gandhi, his working and personal relation with Gandhi family is worth reading. Being an apolitical person, I reluctantly got this book on site unlimited.

Pleasantly surprised. Very readable, some interesting details about events and persons from that era. An excellent read, one of the best autobiographies I have read.

However, editing is poor, even I would have done a better job. The autobiography is primarily divided into three sections: His childhood, IFS travails and Political filght. The author has colored a vivid picture of the erstwhile princely state of bharatpur, its eccentric king and his memories in this regard. First brush with authority was caused due to him hanging a poster of Mahatma in his dorm room, in turn irking the imperialistic Principal Stow, mentions Natwar Singh.

K. Natwar Singh_One Life is Not Enough

Another time, he along with his friend Badan Singh planned and successfully executed an escapade from Scindia School, landed in hometown Bharatpur, only to be beaten up by his father and Maharaja and sent back.

Stephens and his joining Corpus Christi College, Cambride.All of us, while in Srinagar, felt uneasy. Brijendra Singh. This book also provides consent on many speculations of yesteryear like Mathai being CIA agent, Manmohan unhappy with Sonia, and so on. Around that time.

Since he didnt have much by way of academic distinction then though he was an excellent horse rider and an energetic hockey player , he used this period to study law. We did not fall for each other but over the decades.

At one point, the author describes how he called Indira "the Empress of India", which for a bureaucrat should be ideally unusual. Keshav Dev. Eight gentlemen sat around a semi-circular table.

ERICH from Hickory
Browse my other articles. I have only one hobby: hooping. I relish reading books more .
>